Āut Labs
  • Āut Labs
  • The Āutonomy Matrix
  • $AUT Token
  • Framework Intro & Components
    • Āutonomy Matrix
    • The Participation Score
      • More about Expected Contributions
    • ĀutID: a Member< >Hub bond
    • Interactions, Tasks & Contributions - a context-agnostic standard.
    • Contribution Points
      • Calculating eCP and other dependent & independent params
    • The Hub - or, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.
    • Roles on-chain. If there is Hope, it lies in the Roles
    • Commitment Level as an RWA
      • Discrete CL Allocation
    • Peer Value
      • Flow & aggregation of value
  • 🕹️Participation Score
    • Design Thinking
      • Problems with traditional Local Reputation parameters
      • Innovation Compared to other “Local Reputation” protocols
      • Hub<>Participant Accountability & Rewards
    • Core Parameters
    • Formulæ
    • Edge Cases
      • 1. The Private Island
      • 2. Cannibal Members
      • 3. The Ghost & the House on Fire
    • PS Formula for all Edge Cases
    • Conclusions
  • 🎇Prestige
    • Prestige: introducing measurable credibility for a DAO
    • Need for a DAO to measure its KPIs overtime (on-chain)
    • Archetypes
      • Defining an Organizational Type
      • Existing Organizational Types
      • Deep-dive: Calculating current Parameters (p)
    • Formulas for Prestige
      • Normalization of p
    • Prestige for all edge cases
      • Relationship between Prestige & Archetype parameters
    • How to expand Prestige through external Data Sources
    • Use-cases & Conclusions
  • 🌎Peer Value
    • Initial Applications
    • Relationship between Participant, Hubs & Peer Value
    • Peer Value (v) as a directed graph
      • Calculating normalized Participation Score (PS'')
      • Calculating normalized Prestige (P'')
      • Calculating the Contributor Archetype (a)
    • The Peer archetype
      • Formulæ for α & deep-dives
      • Formulæ for β & deep-dives
      • Formulæ for γ & deep-dives
    • Conclusions & Initial Applications
  • ⚽Appendices & Playgrounds
    • PS Simulations
    • PS Playground
    • Prestige Simulations
    • Prestige Playground
Powered by GitBook
LogoLogo

PARTICIPATE

  • Website
  • ĀutOS
  • Hub Explorer

© Āut Labs 2025

On this page
  1. Prestige
  2. Archetypes

Existing Organizational Types

PreviousDefining an Organizational TypeNextDeep-dive: Calculating current Parameters (p)

Last updated 2 months ago

From the we can extract 5 community types:

  1. Size: dominant parameter -> Sundefined\overlinesegment SS A relative value that represents how “big” a Hub compared to others in the ecosystem. This Archetype encourages the largest projects to verify & maintain a positive influence in the overall ecosystem.

  2. Participation: dominant parameter -> PS‾\overline {PS}PS The average Participation Score of a Hub’s Contributors. This Archetype gives more insights about the shared trust between members, and their constant effort towards a common goal.

  3. Conviction: dominant parameter -> iCL‾\overline {iCL}iCL The avg. Commitment of the contributors of your Hub. This archetype is for the true believers – reflecting Members’ level of trust and belief in your project’s vision.

  4. Performance: dominant parameter -> P→\overrightarrow PP The ratio between tasks created and tasks completed during a given period. This Archetype is for ambitious, coordinated communities set to create real impact and thrive.

  5. Growth: dominant parameter -> Gˇ\check GGˇ Everything starts with something. This Archetype is not for the largest Hubs, it’s for the ones with a continuous, organic, slow and steady growth determined by their scale.

🎇
parameters p