Āut Labs
  • Āut Labs
  • The Āutonomy Matrix
  • $AUT Token
  • Framework Intro & Components
    • Āutonomy Matrix
    • The Participation Score
      • More about Expected Contributions
    • ĀutID: a Member< >Hub bond
    • Interactions, Tasks & Contributions - a context-agnostic standard.
    • Contribution Points
      • Calculating eCP and other dependent & independent params
    • The Hub - or, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.
    • Roles on-chain. If there is Hope, it lies in the Roles
    • Commitment Level as an RWA
      • Discrete CL Allocation
    • Peer Value
      • Flow & aggregation of value
  • 🕹️Participation Score
    • Design Thinking
      • Problems with traditional Local Reputation parameters
      • Innovation Compared to other “Local Reputation” protocols
      • Hub<>Participant Accountability & Rewards
    • Core Parameters
    • Formulæ
    • Edge Cases
      • 1. The Private Island
      • 2. Cannibal Members
      • 3. The Ghost & the House on Fire
    • PS Formula for all Edge Cases
    • Conclusions
  • 🎇Prestige
    • Prestige: introducing measurable credibility for a DAO
    • Need for a DAO to measure its KPIs overtime (on-chain)
    • Archetypes
      • Defining an Organizational Type
      • Existing Organizational Types
      • Deep-dive: Calculating current Parameters (p)
    • Formulas for Prestige
      • Normalization of p
    • Prestige for all edge cases
      • Relationship between Prestige & Archetype parameters
    • How to expand Prestige through external Data Sources
    • Use-cases & Conclusions
  • 🌎Peer Value
    • Initial Applications
    • Relationship between Participant, Hubs & Peer Value
    • Peer Value (v) as a directed graph
      • Calculating normalized Participation Score (PS'')
      • Calculating normalized Prestige (P'')
      • Calculating the Contributor Archetype (a)
    • The Peer archetype
      • Formulæ for α & deep-dives
      • Formulæ for β & deep-dives
      • Formulæ for γ & deep-dives
    • Conclusions & Initial Applications
  • ⚽Appendices & Playgrounds
    • PS Simulations
    • PS Playground
    • Prestige Simulations
    • Prestige Playground
Powered by GitBook
LogoLogo

PARTICIPATE

  • Website
  • ĀutOS
  • Hub Explorer

© Āut Labs 2025

On this page
  1. Prestige
  2. Archetypes

Deep-dive: Calculating current Parameters (p)

PreviousExisting Organizational TypesNextFormulas for Prestige

Last updated 2 months ago

The protocol currently uses 5 parameters to calculate a Hub's Prestige and their ability to deliver on operational and business drivers. These can locally (in a Hub) or globally (through ĀIP voting).

Current parameters are:

  1. Sundefined\overlinesegment SS (Size) -> TCMh⋅max(TCM)\displaystyle \frac {TCM_{\tt h\cdot}}{max(TCM)}max(TCM)TCMh⋅​​ A relative value that compares the TCM (Total Community Members) of a Hub against the TCM of the biggest Hub in the ecosystem.

  2. PS‾\overline {PS}PS (Average Member Participation), calculated as: ∑j=1nPSj×1TCM\displaystyle \sum_{j = 1}^n PS_{j} \times \frac {1}{TCM}j=1∑n​PSj​×TCM1​

  3. iCL‾\overline {iCL}iCL (Average Commitment Level in a Hub), calculated as: ∑j=1niCLj×1TCM\displaystyle \sum_{j =1}^n iCL_{j} \times \frac {1} {TCM}j=1∑n​iCLj​×TCM1​

  4. P→\overrightarrow PP (Community Performance), calculated as: ∑j=1nGCpj×1TCp\displaystyle \sum_{j = 1}^n GCp_{j} \times \frac {1} {TCp}j=1∑n​GCpj​×TCp1​ Given Contributions (from Hub's Participants) over Total Contribution Points.

  5. Gˇ\check GGˇ (Growth of Community), calculated as: TCMTn−TCMTn−1TCMTn−1\displaystyle \frac {TCM_{T_{n}} - TCM_{T_{n-1}}}{TCM_{T_{n-1}}}TCMTn−1​​TCMTn​​−TCMTn−1​​​

🎇
be expanded