Āut Labs
  • Āut Labs
  • The Āutonomy Matrix
  • $AUT Token
  • Framework Intro & Components
    • Āutonomy Matrix
    • The Participation Score
      • More about Expected Contributions
    • ĀutID: a Member< >Hub bond
    • Interactions, Tasks & Contributions - a context-agnostic standard.
    • Contribution Points
      • Calculating eCP and other dependent & independent params
    • The Hub - or, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.
    • Roles on-chain. If there is Hope, it lies in the Roles
    • Commitment Level as an RWA
      • Discrete CL Allocation
    • Peer Value
      • Flow & aggregation of value
  • 🕹️Participation Score
    • Design Thinking
      • Problems with traditional Local Reputation parameters
      • Innovation Compared to other “Local Reputation” protocols
      • Hub<>Participant Accountability & Rewards
    • Core Parameters
    • Formulæ
    • Edge Cases
      • 1. The Private Island
      • 2. Cannibal Members
      • 3. The Ghost & the House on Fire
    • PS Formula for all Edge Cases
    • Conclusions
  • 🎇Prestige
    • Prestige: introducing measurable credibility for a DAO
    • Need for a DAO to measure its KPIs overtime (on-chain)
    • Archetypes
      • Defining an Organizational Type
      • Existing Organizational Types
      • Deep-dive: Calculating current Parameters (p)
    • Formulas for Prestige
      • Normalization of p
    • Prestige for all edge cases
      • Relationship between Prestige & Archetype parameters
    • How to expand Prestige through external Data Sources
    • Use-cases & Conclusions
  • 🌎Peer Value
    • Initial Applications
    • Relationship between Participant, Hubs & Peer Value
    • Peer Value (v) as a directed graph
      • Calculating normalized Participation Score (PS'')
      • Calculating normalized Prestige (P'')
      • Calculating the Contributor Archetype (a)
    • The Peer archetype
      • Formulæ for α & deep-dives
      • Formulæ for β & deep-dives
      • Formulæ for γ & deep-dives
    • Conclusions & Initial Applications
  • ⚽Appendices & Playgrounds
    • PS Simulations
    • PS Playground
    • Prestige Simulations
    • Prestige Playground
Powered by GitBook
LogoLogo

PARTICIPATE

  • Website
  • ĀutOS
  • Hub Explorer

© Āut Labs 2025

On this page
  1. Framework Intro & Components
  2. Contribution Points

Calculating eCP and other dependent & independent params

PreviousContribution PointsNextThe Hub - or, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.

Last updated 10 months ago

EC is the most important parameter in the Āut's Participation framework.

It determines the expected contributions of a contributor of a Hub during a specific period.

It’s based on the Commitment Level chosen by the Individual Member, and it’s necessary to determine the ratio between the promise / commitment of a contributor, and their actual participation.

It’s calculated as:

EC=fiCL×TCPEC = fiCL \times TCPEC=fiCL×TCP

where:

  • TCP: Total Contributions Points in a Community. Sum of all contributions points available in a community in a given period. They can be acquired by members by completing tasks and interactions. Each Task and Interaction has a custom weight (spacing between 1 and 10).

  • fiCL: Fractional Commitment Level per Individual


Deep-dive: Fractional Commitment Level

The Fractional Commitment Level is the iCL of a Hub’s participant (j) in relation to the total.

It is calculated as fiCLj=iCLjiCLtotfiCL_{j} = \frac{iCL_{j}}{iCL_{tot}}fiCLj​=iCLtot​iCLj​​ where iCLtotiCL_{ tot}iCLtot​ is the sum of all Participants’ iCL, calculated as the ratio between and individual’s commitment level, and the sum of all the commitment levels of all Participants to a Hub in a given period:

fiCL=iCLiCLtotfiCL = \frac{iCL}{iCL_{tot}}fiCL=iCLtot​iCL​

with:

  • iCLjiCL_{j}iCLj​: individual Commitment Level of j

  • tiCLtiCLtiCL: sum of all iCLs of participants in the Hub [h⋅][\tt h \cdot][h⋅]: tiCL=∑iCL[h⋅]tiCL = \sum iCL_{[\tt h \cdot]}tiCL=∑iCL[h⋅]​


EC’ = normalized EC accounting the time factor ΔT

where:

This way it's possible to create a generalized abstraction to factor in participants who join a community after the start of the period T.

This works simply by accounting all absolute time available in a community in relation to each individual member:

This allows for a continuous calculation of EC for all members in different, arbitrarily small intervals within the same period T.

We may consider a time factor (tftftf or ΔT\Delta{T}ΔT) to determine EC based on the time left in a period:

EC′=EC×Δ(T)EC' = EC \times \Delta(T)EC′=EC×Δ(T)

ΔT is calculated as =TlTi\Delta{T} \text{ is calculated as }= \frac {T_{l}} {T_{i}}ΔT is calculated as =Ti​Tl​​

Tl is the time left in a period TT_{l} \text { is the time left in a period } TTl​ is the time left in a period T;

Ti is the total time at the start of the period TT_{i} \text{ is the total time at the start of the period }TTi​ is the total time at the start of the period T;

∑(ΔT)=∑(Tl)∑(Ti)\sum (\Delta_{T}) = \frac {\sum (T_{l})} {\sum (T_{i})}∑(ΔT​)=∑(Ti​)∑(Tl​)​, from which we extrapolate a fractional ΔT as →(fTlfTi)×T\Delta{T} \text{ as }\rightarrow(\frac {fT_{l}} {fT_{i}}) \times TΔT as →(fTi​fTl​​)×T