Āut Labs
  • Āut Labs
  • The Āutonomy Matrix
  • $AUT Token
  • Framework Intro & Components
    • Āutonomy Matrix
    • The Participation Score
      • More about Expected Contributions
    • ĀutID: a Member< >Hub bond
    • Interactions, Tasks & Contributions - a context-agnostic standard.
    • Contribution Points
      • Calculating eCP and other dependent & independent params
    • The Hub - or, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.
    • Roles on-chain. If there is Hope, it lies in the Roles
    • Commitment Level as an RWA
      • Discrete CL Allocation
    • Peer Value
      • Flow & aggregation of value
  • 🕹️Participation Score
    • Design Thinking
      • Problems with traditional Local Reputation parameters
      • Innovation Compared to other “Local Reputation” protocols
      • Hub<>Participant Accountability & Rewards
    • Core Parameters
    • Formulæ
    • Edge Cases
      • 1. The Private Island
      • 2. Cannibal Members
      • 3. The Ghost & the House on Fire
    • PS Formula for all Edge Cases
    • Conclusions
  • 🎇Prestige
    • Prestige: introducing measurable credibility for a DAO
    • Need for a DAO to measure its KPIs overtime (on-chain)
    • Archetypes
      • Defining an Organizational Type
      • Existing Organizational Types
      • Deep-dive: Calculating current Parameters (p)
    • Formulas for Prestige
      • Normalization of p
    • Prestige for all edge cases
      • Relationship between Prestige & Archetype parameters
    • How to expand Prestige through external Data Sources
    • Use-cases & Conclusions
  • 🌎Peer Value
    • Initial Applications
    • Relationship between Participant, Hubs & Peer Value
    • Peer Value (v) as a directed graph
      • Calculating normalized Participation Score (PS'')
      • Calculating normalized Prestige (P'')
      • Calculating the Contributor Archetype (a)
    • The Peer archetype
      • Formulæ for α & deep-dives
      • Formulæ for β & deep-dives
      • Formulæ for γ & deep-dives
    • Conclusions & Initial Applications
  • ⚽Appendices & Playgrounds
    • PS Simulations
    • PS Playground
    • Prestige Simulations
    • Prestige Playground
Powered by GitBook
LogoLogo

PARTICIPATE

  • Website
  • ĀutOS
  • Hub Explorer

© Āut Labs 2025

On this page
  1. Peer Value
  2. The Peer archetype

Formulæ for γ & deep-dives

3. Variety (γ\gammaγ)

The concept of Variety is quite intuitive: it calculates how "diverse" are someone's contributions across all the different Hubs they are part of. This keeps into consideration the Role of the individual in each one of their Hubs, as well as the Market in which each Hub operates, and the different Contributions they commit to complete, and actually submit. In one sentence: someone's Variety score is based on the amount of "unique" contributions (= contributions which do not repeat) they deliver across all their Hubs, divided by the total amount of Contributions submitted (= how many of the Contributions submitted are different from the others).

It's calculated using the formula:

γ=∑h=1nrγj,h×100H⋅\gamma = \displaystyle \sum_{h = 1}^n r\gamma_{\tiny {j, h}} \times \frac {100} {\tt H \cdot}γ=h=1∑n​rγj,h​×H⋅100​

where rγr\gammarγ is the "credible relative variety" of j’s contribution at the local Hub’s level.

Deep-dive: calculating rγr\gammarγ

As a reminder, rγr\gammarγ is calculated by:

  1. Checking the number of unique contribution types (uCT) completed by j in [h⋅][\tt h \cdot][h⋅]

  2. Calculating the fractional Contribution Types of j in [h⋅][\tt h \cdot][h⋅], as:

fCT=uCTj,hmax(uCTk,h)\displaystyle fCT = \frac {uCT_{j, h}} {max(uCT_{k, h})}fCT=max(uCTk,h​)uCTj,h​​

where:

  • fCT is the fractional value of j’s Contribution Types in the Hub [h⋅][\tt h \cdot][h⋅]

  • uCT is the amount of Unique Contribution Types completed by j in the Hub [h⋅][\tt h \cdot][h⋅]

  • max(uCT)max(uCT)max(uCT) is the highest amount of Unique Contribution Types completed by any Participant in the Hub [h⋅][\tt h \cdot][h⋅]

  • To properly evaluate rγj,hr\gamma_{j, h}rγj,h​we need to consider the credibility of a Hub as well:

rγj,h=fCT×P(h⋅)′r\gamma{j, h} = fCT \times \mathfrak P'_{(\tt h \cdot)}rγj,h=fCT×P(h⋅)′​

This will ensure that the Hubs considered are credible and genuine communities.

P(h⋅)′\mathfrak P'_{(\tt h \cdot)}P(h⋅)′​ is the normalized value of Prestige for a Hub $h$, calculated as:

P′(h⋅)=P(h⋅)max(P(N⋅j))\displaystyle\mathfrak P'{(\tt h \cdot)} = \frac {\mathfrak P{(\tt h \cdot)}} {max(\mathfrak P_{(\tt N \cdot_{j})})}P′(h⋅)=max(P(N⋅j​)​)P(h⋅)​

Once we have rγj,h ∀ h⋅in H⋅jr\gamma_{j, h} \text { } \forall \text { } \tt h \cdot in \text { } \tt H \cdot_{j}rγj,h​ ∀ h⋅in H⋅j​, then we can calculate γ\gammaγ as:

γ=∑h=1nrγj,H⋅×100H⋅\gamma = \displaystyle \sum_{h = 1}^n r\gamma_{\tiny {j, \tt H \cdot}} \times \frac {100} {\tt H \cdot}γ=h=1∑n​rγj,H⋅​×H⋅100​
PreviousFormulæ for β & deep-divesNextConclusions & Initial Applications

Last updated 8 months ago

🌎