Āut Labs
  • Āut Labs
  • The Āutonomy Matrix
  • $AUT Token
  • Framework Intro & Components
    • Āutonomy Matrix
    • The Participation Score
      • More about Expected Contributions
    • ĀutID: a Member< >Hub bond
    • Interactions, Tasks & Contributions - a context-agnostic standard.
    • Contribution Points
      • Calculating eCP and other dependent & independent params
    • The Hub - or, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.
    • Roles on-chain. If there is Hope, it lies in the Roles
    • Commitment Level as an RWA
      • Discrete CL Allocation
    • Peer Value
      • Flow & aggregation of value
  • 🕹️Participation Score
    • Design Thinking
      • Problems with traditional Local Reputation parameters
      • Innovation Compared to other “Local Reputation” protocols
      • Hub<>Participant Accountability & Rewards
    • Core Parameters
    • Formulæ
    • Edge Cases
      • 1. The Private Island
      • 2. Cannibal Members
      • 3. The Ghost & the House on Fire
    • PS Formula for all Edge Cases
    • Conclusions
  • 🎇Prestige
    • Prestige: introducing measurable credibility for a DAO
    • Need for a DAO to measure its KPIs overtime (on-chain)
    • Archetypes
      • Defining an Organizational Type
      • Existing Organizational Types
      • Deep-dive: Calculating current Parameters (p)
    • Formulas for Prestige
      • Normalization of p
    • Prestige for all edge cases
      • Relationship between Prestige & Archetype parameters
    • How to expand Prestige through external Data Sources
    • Use-cases & Conclusions
  • 🌎Peer Value
    • Initial Applications
    • Relationship between Participant, Hubs & Peer Value
    • Peer Value (v) as a directed graph
      • Calculating normalized Participation Score (PS'')
      • Calculating normalized Prestige (P'')
      • Calculating the Contributor Archetype (a)
    • The Peer archetype
      • Formulæ for α & deep-dives
      • Formulæ for β & deep-dives
      • Formulæ for γ & deep-dives
    • Conclusions & Initial Applications
  • ⚽Appendices & Playgrounds
    • PS Simulations
    • PS Playground
    • Prestige Simulations
    • Prestige Playground
Powered by GitBook
LogoLogo

PARTICIPATE

  • Website
  • ĀutOS
  • Hub Explorer

© Āut Labs 2025

On this page
  1. Peer Value
  2. The Peer archetype

Formulæ for α & deep-dives

PreviousThe Peer archetypeNextFormulæ for β & deep-dives

Last updated 8 months ago

1. Centrality (α\alphaα)

The Centrality represents how needed/relevant is a Contributor to a Hub, comparing it directly to all other Contributors. In fact, if on one side, multiple Contributors can have a positive Participation Score - on the other, the Centrality parameter measures how high is someone's participation respect to all other top contributors. This both shows the true dedication / workload of a member to bootstrap the Hub, and helps Operators to understand who is making the heavy lift to bring the Hub to the next level, and can reward them accordingly.

To calculate a Contributor's Centrality ( α\alphaα ) within the Hub, we can use this simple formula:

α=cPS(j,H⋅)∣Hj∣×100\displaystyle \alpha = \frac {cPS_{\tiny {(j, \tt H \cdot)}}}{|H_j|} \times 100α=∣Hj​∣cPS(j,H⋅)​​×100

where:

  • α\alphaα is the Centrality of j’s Participation in each one of their Hubs.

  • cPS(j,H⋅)cPS_{(j, \tt H \cdot)}cPS(j,H⋅)​ is the absolute centrality of j’s PS in all their local Hubs [h⋅][\tt h \cdot][h⋅] in the Set [H⋅][\tt H \cdot][H⋅]

  • [H⋅]j[{\tt H \cdot}]_{j}[H⋅]j​ is the Set of all Hubs [h⋅][\tt h \cdot][h⋅] to which j contributes.

  • max(PS[1,…,n], h)max(PS_{[1, …, n], \text{ h}})max(PS[1,…,n], h​) is the highest PS value of any participant in Hub [h⋅][\tt h \cdot][h⋅].

Deep-dive: calculating local cPScPScPS

As a reminder, the Local Centrality of j’s Participation Score in a Hub is calculated as:

cPSj,h⋅=PSj,hmax⁡(PS[1,...,n],h)\displaystyle cPS_{j, \tt h \cdot} = \frac{PS_{j,h}}{\max(PS_{[1, ..., n],h})}cPSj,h⋅​=max(PS[1,...,n],h​)PSj,h​​

To obtain α\alphaα (the “absolute centrality”), we can calculate all the local cPS of the Participant across their Hubs:

cPSj,H⋅=∑cPSj,h⋅\displaystyle cPS_{j, \tt H \cdot} = \sum cPS_{j, \tt h \cdot}cPSj,H⋅​=∑cPSj,h⋅​

and divide it by the total amount of Hubs [H⋅][\tt H \cdot][H⋅] of which j is a Participant:

α=cPS(j,H⋅)∣Hj∣\displaystyle \alpha = \frac {cPS_{\tiny {(j, \tt H \cdot)}}}{|H_j|}α=∣Hj​∣cPS(j,H⋅)​​

🌎