Āut Labs
  • Āut Labs
  • The Āutonomy Matrix
  • $AUT Token
  • Framework Intro & Components
    • Āutonomy Matrix
    • The Participation Score
      • More about Expected Contributions
    • ĀutID: a Member< >Hub bond
    • Interactions, Tasks & Contributions - a context-agnostic standard.
    • Contribution Points
      • Calculating eCP and other dependent & independent params
    • The Hub - or, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.
    • Roles on-chain. If there is Hope, it lies in the Roles
    • Commitment Level as an RWA
      • Discrete CL Allocation
    • Peer Value
      • Flow & aggregation of value
  • 🕹️Participation Score
    • Design Thinking
      • Problems with traditional Local Reputation parameters
      • Innovation Compared to other “Local Reputation” protocols
      • Hub<>Participant Accountability & Rewards
    • Core Parameters
    • Formulæ
    • Edge Cases
      • 1. The Private Island
      • 2. Cannibal Members
      • 3. The Ghost & the House on Fire
    • PS Formula for all Edge Cases
    • Conclusions
  • 🎇Prestige
    • Prestige: introducing measurable credibility for a DAO
    • Need for a DAO to measure its KPIs overtime (on-chain)
    • Archetypes
      • Defining an Organizational Type
      • Existing Organizational Types
      • Deep-dive: Calculating current Parameters (p)
    • Formulas for Prestige
      • Normalization of p
    • Prestige for all edge cases
      • Relationship between Prestige & Archetype parameters
    • How to expand Prestige through external Data Sources
    • Use-cases & Conclusions
  • 🌎Peer Value
    • Initial Applications
    • Relationship between Participant, Hubs & Peer Value
    • Peer Value (v) as a directed graph
      • Calculating normalized Participation Score (PS'')
      • Calculating normalized Prestige (P'')
      • Calculating the Contributor Archetype (a)
    • The Peer archetype
      • Formulæ for α & deep-dives
      • Formulæ for β & deep-dives
      • Formulæ for γ & deep-dives
    • Conclusions & Initial Applications
  • ⚽Appendices & Playgrounds
    • PS Simulations
    • PS Playground
    • Prestige Simulations
    • Prestige Playground
Powered by GitBook
LogoLogo

PARTICIPATE

  • Website
  • ĀutOS
  • Hub Explorer

© Āut Labs 2025

On this page
  1. Prestige

Prestige: introducing measurable credibility for a DAO

A measurable, extendable model for on-chain KPIs, accountability & self-assessment for decentralized projects & DAOs.

The absolute value, or Prestige, of a decentralized project, community or DAO represents their on-chain credibility - based on their activity, tasks, balance in contributors’ skills and efforts.

It relies on a mathematical, context-agnostic system to verify and self-asses a project’s ability to complete tasks, achieve milestones and ultimately its growth and real traction. It replaces vanity-metrics and off-chain externalities with a basket of independent parameters with customizable weights.

The rationale behind it is that, as the decentralized space evolves, it’s critical for decentralized hubs - such as open-source project, DAOs, network states, etc. - to be accountable and measure its KPIs on-par with regular, real-world organizations.

In fact, if on one side the Participation Score and alternative systems aim to verify individual contributor’s credibility and value, it's crucial for a community's credibility to be both internally and externally verifiable. Prestige allows projects to prove their milestones and growth based on KPIs set by themselves internally - both as a warranty for the community itself, as well as for researchers assessing a DAO’s health, or investors considering to fund it.

This accountability extends the relationship between a member's participation within a community (their local reputation) and its value in the wider ecosystem - allowing an individual’s Global Reputation to be reliable and verifiable in the entire ecosystem.

PreviousConclusionsNextNeed for a DAO to measure its KPIs overtime (on-chain)

Last updated 2 months ago

🎇